By Lindsey Kundel, Editor-in-Chief, InGenius Prep
When I first started helping students apply to college, I spent hours reading through course catalogs, admissions blogs, and strategic plans—not just to find the “best fit” schools, but to decode what those schools really wanted.
It quickly became clear that a college’s values and goals often had little to do with buzzwords like “holistic” or “leadership” and everything to do with what I now call institutional priorities.
If you’re applying to college and don’t know what institutional priorities are—or how they affect your chances of admission—this post is for you.
What Are Institutional Priorities?
Institutional priorities are the strategic goals that shape how universities make decisions—about programs, faculty hiring, budgets, and yes, admissions. These priorities reflect a school’s mission, financial health, demographics, and long-term vision.
They’re not static. A school that prioritized increasing international enrollment five years ago might now be investing in mental health infrastructure, expanding sustainability initiatives, or pivoting toward tech fields in response to market demand.
Some common institutional priorities include:
- Academic excellence, especially in targeted disciplines
- Diversity across race, geography, and socioeconomic background
- Financial stability, often tied to full-pay enrollment goals
- First-generation access, to serve social mobility and equity goals
- Special talents—athletics, arts, leadership in service
- Legacy admissions and development connections
- Geographic diversification, particularly for rural or underrepresented states
- Mission-driven initiatives, such as wellness, sustainability, or civic engagement
You may never see these listed in an official admissions guide—but they matter deeply.
Why It Matters: The Hidden Math Behind Admissions
Most applicants imagine a wide-open playing field: submit a strong application, compete on merit, and hope for the best. The reality is different. At many top schools, 40–50% of the class is pre-allocated to students who meet institutional needs.
At Harvard, data from Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard revealed that over 43% of admitted students fell into the ALDC category—Athletes, Legacies, Dean’s interest, and Children of faculty/staff—with admit rates 4–5x higher than unhooked applicants.
Consider these figures:
- Recruited athletes: admit rates as high as 86% in some cycles.
- Legacies: admit rates around 34%—versus ~5% for everyone else.
- Nationwide, legacy students can have admission odds 3x higher than non-legacies, and in some institutions the multiplier jumps to over 15x.
These aren’t criticisms—they’re reminders that admissions is more like building a portfolio than judging a competition. Universities need students who fill specific roles that serve funding, mission, and reputation goals.
A Simplified Example: How a Class of 100 Might Be Allocated
| Priority Category | Approximate % of Seats |
| Recruited Athletes | 10% |
| Legacy / Donor / Faculty Kids | 12–15% |
| Full-Pay International | 10% |
| First-Gen / Low-Income | 10–15% |
| Underrepresented Majors | 10% |
| Mission-Aligned Profiles | 10% |
| Academic Standouts | 25–30% |
(These proportions vary widely by school, but the framework helps.)
If you’re not in a hooked group, your best strategy is to align your application with a school’s current priorities.
How to Research a School’s Real Priorities
The research phase is where savvy applicants gain an edge. Here’s a proven process:
1. Find the Strategic Plan
Colleges often publish a 5–10 year roadmap outlining their goals. These documents can reveal a school’s focus on equity, global citizenship, research growth, or niche fields.
Example: One student applying to Emory noticed that “fostering interfaith engagement” was a top priority. She wove her leadership in her school’s multifaith alliance into her application—and was admitted Early Decision.
Pro Tip: Google “[School Name] strategic plan site:.edu”
2. Read the Common Data Set (CDS)
This annual, under-the-radar document lists what a school considers “very important” in admissions. It also shows financial aid percentages, testing trends, and enrollment breakdowns.
Example: Wake Forest lists “character/personal qualities” as “very important”—a clear signal that well-crafted essays and recommendations can move the needle.
3. Listen Closely to Admissions Officers
Webinars, tours, and info sessions reveal more than you think. Count how often certain initiatives or values are repeated—it’s rarely accidental.
Example: During a Boston University tour, the guide mentioned the new Center for Antiracist Research three separate times. That’s a clear emphasis.
4. Track Recent Investments
Buildings and programs are investments in the future. A new data science building? Expect a STEM push. A performing arts center? Arts enrollment could be growing.
5. Monitor Hiring & Partnerships
Faculty recruitment in specific areas (e.g., AI ethics, climate science) or partnerships with industry often foreshadow new academic priorities.
How to Align Your Application with Institutional Priorities
Once you’ve decoded what a college values, you can position yourself to meet that need—authentically.
Example 1: Undersubscribed Major Strategy
A student targeting a tech-heavy school applied as a philosophy major and connected ethics to AI in her essays. She helped balance the incoming class and earned admission.
Example 2: Rural, Full-Need Applicant
From North Dakota, with strong academics but financial need, another student leaned into his geographic diversity and leadership story—and found his fit at a New England liberal arts college.
Example 3: Full-Pay International
A student with fluency in four languages and global leadership roles aligned perfectly with a school seeking to expand its international profile—and secured admission without test scores.
Pitfalls & Misconceptions
One of the biggest mistakes applicants make is assuming that all colleges share the same priorities or that certain “hooks” automatically work everywhere. In reality, each institution’s needs are unique, and misreading them can waste precious application real estate. Here are three of the most common misconceptions—and the truth behind them.
Myth 1: “Every school wants STEM students.”
It’s true that computer science, engineering, and data science are booming fields, and some universities have doubled their capacity in these majors in recent years. For example, the University of Michigan’s College of Engineering grew undergraduate enrollment by more than 20% over the past decade, and Stanford’s CS department is among its most oversubscribed.
But at other institutions—especially smaller liberal arts colleges—STEM seats are easier to fill than humanities seats. An English major applying to Harvey Mudd might be a harder sell, but an English major applying to a tech-saturated applicant pool at Carnegie Mellon could stand out. I’ve seen students gain admission to highly selective schools precisely because they offered balance: a historian at a tech-heavy university, or a linguist at a math powerhouse. The lesson? Don’t default to STEM unless it’s authentic to you, and recognize that “under-enrolled” majors can be your secret weapon.
Myth 2: “They only care about diversity if you’re from overseas.”
International diversity is a factor, but domestic geographic diversity can be equally important—sometimes even more so. Many selective schools have a glut of applicants from California, New York, Massachusetts, and Texas, while receiving very few from states like North Dakota, Wyoming, or West Virginia.
For instance, Bowdoin College in Maine has openly discussed the challenge of attracting students from rural Midwest states, and some flagship universities admit they are underrepresented in the Southeast or Pacific Northwest. I’ve worked with students whose strongest admissions hook was simply being one of only a handful of applicants from their state. Even within a state, coming from a rural county or an underrepresented urban district can differentiate you. If your location is unusual in a school’s applicant pool, lean into it—your zip code can tell a compelling story.
Myth 3: “Being full-pay always helps.”
At some need-aware institutions, being able to pay full tuition can be a plus, especially in later rounds of admission when financial aid budgets are tight. But at need-blind institutions, the calculus is different. These schools don’t consider a student’s ability to pay when making admissions decisions—but they do still shape classes around academic balance, institutional mission, and diversity goals.
For example, Amherst College is need-blind for U.S. students and meets full demonstrated need, but it still prioritizes first-generation students, underrepresented majors, and mission-aligned talents. In other words, full-pay status won’t outweigh a lack of fit with the school’s strategic direction. I’ve seen full-pay families surprised when their student was deferred or denied despite strong grades—because they hadn’t done the research to see what the school needed that year.
The Bottom Line: Don’t rely on assumptions or hearsay. The same profile that’s irresistible to one institution might be just “another applicant” to another. The most successful students treat every school on their list as a unique puzzle—and fit the pieces accordingly.
Insider’s Cheat Sheet: Known Institutional Priorities at Top Schools
While every college’s priorities shift over time, some are so consistent—and so clearly documented—that they’re worth calling out. These patterns appear year after year in strategic plans, Common Data Set data, public statements, and even admissions case documents.
If you’re applying to one of these schools, understanding these priorities early can help you shape your application narrative well before deadlines hit. Think of this as the “known weather forecast” in the otherwise unpredictable world of college admissions.
| School | Top Institutional Priorities | Examples & Context |
| Harvard University | Legacy & donor ties; athletic recruitment; diversity; interdisciplinary innovation | ~43% ALDC admits (Athlete, Legacy, Donor, Child of faculty); 42 varsity sports; major investments in AI, bioengineering, climate research |
| Yale University | Arts leadership; global citizenship; first-gen/low-income | Renowned drama/music programs; 50+ language study options; strong QuestBridge partner |
| Princeton University | Undergraduate teaching; STEM-policy intersections; expanded financial aid | #1 undergraduate teaching rank; new investments in engineering & public policy; free tuition under $100k family income |
| Columbia University | Core Curriculum; urban engagement; global research/journalism | Humanities-heavy Core; emphasis on thriving in NYC; strong global affairs programs |
| University of Pennsylvania | Business + tech crossover; healthcare leadership; entrepreneurship | Wharton/M&T Program; ties to Penn Medicine; Pennovation Works |
| Brown University | Open Curriculum; social impact; interdisciplinary strengths | Self-directed learning focus; history of student activism; STEM-humanities crossover |
| Dartmouth College | Outdoors culture; small community traditions; rural setting | Dartmouth Outing Club; emphasis on community fit; unique rural appeal |
| Cornell University | Land-grant mission; specialized colleges; sustainability/STEM | Access for NY State residents; strong Agriculture & Life Sciences; sustainability research |
| MIT | Maker culture; interdisciplinary STEM; collaboration | Student-built inventions; integration of CS/AI across majors; team problem-solving ethos |
| Stanford University | Entrepreneurship; athletic excellence; public service | Silicon Valley proximity; one of largest varsity sports programs; scalable social impact |
| Georgetown University | Policy & diplomacy; Jesuit mission | School of Foreign Service; leadership in service & ethics |
| United States Military Academy (West Point) | Leadership; geographic representation | Military prep & leadership experience; balance of admits across all states |
How to Use This Table:
If you see a school you’re targeting, ask yourself:
- Where does my story naturally connect to these priorities?
- What evidence do I have—in academics, activities, or essays—that fits what this school consistently seeks?
- Can I highlight these connections without forcing them?
When students start this analysis early—often before junior year—they have time to shape activities, recommendations, and essay topics in ways that make these alignments feel authentic and inevitable.
The Wild Cards: Schools with Less Predictable Institutional Priorities
Not every college has priorities you can easily map from year to year. Some institutions operate with shifting goals, complex internal politics, or external pressures (like state funding or leadership turnover) that make their admissions strategy less transparent.
This doesn’t mean you can’t research them—it just means your research should be deeper, more program-specific, and updated more frequently. Below are some examples of schools where priorities are more fluid and what that means for applicants.
| School Type / Examples | Why Priorities Are Less Clear | What Changes Most Often | Applicant Strategy |
| Large Public Flagships University of Michigan, University of Texas at Austin, University of Washington, Penn State | Many colleges & programs with different goals; state residency quotas; huge applicant pools | In-state vs. out-of-state balance; departmental admit rates; merit aid thresholds | Research at the college/major level; track state higher-ed reports and budget changes |
| Test-Optional Regional Private UniversitiesAmerican University, DePaul University, University of Denver | Enrollment management often driven by tuition revenue and market competition | Merit aid offers; emphasis on certain markets; test policy shifts | Watch Common Data Set “Very Important” factors yearly; monitor new marketing or program launches |
| Institutions in Leadership or Financial TransitionSmall liberal arts colleges with new presidents or budget pressures | New leadership can overhaul strategy; financial constraints prompt rapid pivots | Program closures/additions; geographic recruitment shifts; aid policy changes | Follow leadership communications; scan board meeting notes; check faculty hiring trends |
| Schools in Competitive Regional MarketsMid-Atlantic privates, Midwest urban campuses | Competing heavily with nearby institutions for the same applicants | Price positioning; new majors; partnerships with local employers | Pay attention to local press, partnerships, and announced capital projects |
Key takeaway:
For these “wild card” schools, a one-time research session isn’t enough. You’ll need to check back regularly—especially in the months before you apply—to catch changes in emphasis. In many cases, aligning with a department’s needs will be more effective than aiming for broad university-wide priorities.
Looking Ahead: Institutional Priorities in the Next Cycle
Institutional priorities aren’t static—they shift with market demands, cultural changes, and internal university strategy. What mattered most five years ago may now be an afterthought, and what feels “emerging” today can quickly become a core driver of admissions decisions. Families who understand these shifts can position applications not just for current alignment, but for future relevance.
Here are four trends likely to shape admissions priorities in the coming cycles:
AI and Data Science Programs Expanding Rapidly
The AI boom isn’t just changing industries—it’s reshaping higher education. Schools from the University of California system to liberal arts colleges like Davidson are launching AI-focused majors or interdisciplinary programs combining data science with fields like ethics, biology, and public policy. Expect heightened competition for STEM seats, but also opportunities for applicants who can connect AI literacy to other disciplines (e.g., journalism, healthcare, environmental studies).
Mental Health & Wellness Investments Increasing, Especially Post-Pandemic
The pandemic revealed deep gaps in student wellness support. In response, universities like Princeton and Ohio State have built new counseling centers, hired mental health professionals, and woven well-being into academic advising. Students who demonstrate resilience, leadership in peer support, or involvement in wellness initiatives may find those experiences resonate more strongly in future admissions cycles.
Sustainability & Climate Initiatives Attracting Mission-Driven Students
From MIT’s Climate Action Plan to Colorado College’s carbon neutrality pledge, sustainability has become a defining feature of campus identity for many institutions. Applicants with research, activism, or entrepreneurship in renewable energy, environmental justice, or conservation are likely to be sought after—especially when they can connect their work to a school’s existing climate commitments.
Geographic & Political Diversity as Campuses Seek Balanced Dialogue
Many campuses have recognized that intellectual diversity and political balance contribute to the quality of classroom discussion. Schools are actively seeking students from regions, communities, or backgrounds underrepresented in their applicant pools—not just for demographic variety, but to foster richer debate. For example, a student from a rural farming community in Nebraska might bring insights into sustainability discussions that differ from peers in urban policy programs.
The Bottom Line: The trends above aren’t fads—they’re reflections of where universities are investing millions of dollars and shaping their public identity. Applicants who can authentically connect their experiences, goals, and essays to one or more of these priorities won’t just seem like a fit for the current class—they’ll feel like part of the school’s future.
Final Thought
You’re not just applying to a university. You’re applying to join a strategy—a class designed to meet goals you may not see on the brochure.
Once you understand a school’s institutional priorities, you can stop asking “Am I good enough?” and start asking “How do I fit into what this school needs next?”
And that shift changes everything.
Need more advice? Be sure to reach out to us today for your free consultation.
Want to Go Deeper? Your Institutional Priorities Reading List
If this topic sparks your curiosity, there’s a wealth of research, reporting, and insider accounts that can help you see how institutional priorities shape admissions decisions—and why they matter for your application strategy. The resources below include landmark court cases, investigative journalism, higher-ed data reports, and books from some of the most respected voices in the field. Whether you’re a parent, student, or counselor, these readings will give you a richer perspective on the forces shaping selective college admissions today.
Core References & Reports
- Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 397 F. Supp. 3d 126 (D. Mass. 2019) – Landmark case revealing internal admissions data at one of the world’s most selective universities.
- The New York Times (2018, September 19). A Deeper Look at College Admissions – Accessible reporting on how priorities like legacy and athletics influence the process.
- Chronicle of Higher Education (2023). Shifting Budgets and Academic Priorities – Insight into how financial and academic strategies shape enrollment.
- NACAC (2023). State of College Admission Report – Annual, data-rich overview of trends in college admissions nationwide.
- Forbes (2024). Athletic Recruiting Offers Greater Odds of Ivy League Admissions Than Legacy Status – Analysis of data on athletic recruitment advantages.
- Journalists Resource (2023). College Admissions: Athletes, Legacies, and SAT Score Equivalencies – Research summary connecting admissions hooks to quantifiable advantages.
Books & Longform Reading
- Who Gets In and Why – Jeffrey Selingo. A behind-the-scenes, data-driven exploration of modern admissions decision-making.
- The Gatekeepers – Jacques Steinberg. A classic inside look at the Wesleyan admissions office and the human side of selection.
- The Price You Pay for College – Ron Lieber. A family-friendly guide to understanding the value of a degree and navigating financial considerations.
- College (Un)bound – Jeffrey J. Selingo. A macro view of higher-ed change and the shifting nature of institutional priorities.
Research Tools
- NACAC’s State of College Admission – The professional gold standard for data on admissions factors and priorities.
- Common Data Set Archives – Annual, school-specific data revealing which factors each institution values most and how those have shifted over time.