By Lindsey Kundel, Editor in Chief, InGenius Prep
Image Credit: Unsplash+
For years, U.S. enrollment strategy has focused on Asia’s big fluctuations—India’s surge, China’s slow stabilization, and Southeast Asia’s emerging momentum. But the 2023 SEVIS report shows a different kind of story: North America grew 5.9% year-over-year, one of the strongest and steadiest regional rebounds in the entire dataset. And that growth wasn’t driven by splashy new markets. It came from the neighbors the U.S. most often takes for granted.
Canada and Mexico are not “emerging opportunities.” They are long-standing, deeply rooted, and culturally intertwined student pipelines that have been remarkably stable for more than a decade. While Asia continues to dominate institutional strategy conversations, the countries with the most predictable educational flows into the United States sit directly on its borders—and they have for years.
Understanding why requires shifting from a scarcity model (“Where will we find the next big market?”) to a clarity model (“Which markets reliably deliver year after year, and why aren’t we investing there?”). This blog is about the latter.
I. The Blind Spot Next Door
Institutions often talk about “reliable” markets as if reliability were a distant phenomenon. But the SEVIS data makes clear that Canada and Mexico together send more than 50,000 active F-1 students to the U.S. annually, with far less volatility than the markets that typically dominate recruitment budgets.
Canada’s totals have hovered between 25,000 and 28,000 for nearly a decade. Mexico ranked #10 globally in 2023 with 23,756 active F-1 students—a number that surprises many enrollment leaders only because Open Doors reports higher education totals alone.
And Mexico’s K–12 footprint is even more striking: 6.8% of all international K–12 students in the U.S. (3,732 in 2023) are from Mexico. CBS News has documented the daily reality behind these numbers—Mexican students who commute across the border every morning for school, often in districts stretching from California to Texas. These aren’t isolated cases; they reflect a deep, generational pattern of cross-border educational continuity.
These are not incidental flows. They reflect family networks, shared cultural frameworks, and longstanding mobility habits that consistently draw students north and south. The problem isn’t a lack of demand. The problem is that American institutions haven’t centered these markets in their strategic plans.
Canada and Mexico Enrollment in the United States (Open Doors vs. SEVIS, 2020–2023)
| Country | Academic Year (Open Doors – Higher Ed Only) | Open Doors | Calendar Year (SEVIS – All Active F-1/M-1) | SEVIS |
| Canada | 2020–21 | 25,143 | CY 2021 | 37,453 |
| 2021–22 | 27,013 | CY 2022 | 41,392 | |
| 2022–23 | 27,876 | CY 2023 | 43,873 | |
| Mexico | 2020–21 | 12,986 | CY 2021 | 19,680 |
| 2021–22 | 14,500 | CY 2022 | 22,715 | |
| 2022–23 | 14,541 | CY 2023 | 23,756 |
Table Takeaways:
- Both Canada and Mexico show remarkable year-over-year stability, even through the pandemic and global enrollment volatility.
- Canada’s Open Doors numbers increased steadily from 25,143 → 27,013 → 27,876 between 2020–21 and 2022–23.
- SEVIS totals for Canada are even larger, rising from 37,453 in 2021 to 43,873 in 2023 — indicating strong non–higher-ed F-1/M-1 participation.
- Mexico’s Open Doors numbers also remained stable, holding between 12,986 and 14,541 from 2020–23.
- SEVIS totals for Mexico grew consistently, from 19,680 in 2021 to 23,756 in 2023 — reinforcing Mexico’s position as a top-ten F-1 source country.
Overall takeaway: Canada and Mexico are not emerging markets — they are mature, structurally stable, proximity-driven pipelines with far less volatility than Asia, the Middle East, or sub-Saharan Africa.
II. Canada: A Competitor, a Contributor, and a Study-Abroad Constant
Canada’s relationship with U.S. higher education is unusually reciprocal: it sends tens of thousands of students to the United States every year while simultaneously attracting a rising number of American students to its own institutions. Yet outbound mobility from Canada to the U.S. is one of the most stable patterns in international education.
Open Doors reports 27,876 Canadian students in U.S. higher education in 2022–23, a 3.2% increase from the prior year and fully consistent with the country’s decade-long range. Even the COVID era—when global mobility collapsed—barely dented Canada’s long-term numbers. Canadian students returned quickly and in nearly identical volumes.
Why the stability?
Canadian students tend to apply for reasons that do not swing dramatically with global events:
- Prestige: Ivy League, NESCAC, and top public flagships remain strong magnets.
- The liberal arts model: A key differentiator from Canada’s more specialized pathways.
- Athletic recruitment: Especially hockey, swimming, tennis, and rowing.
- Curricular alignment: IB, AP, and Ontario standards make academic transitions straightforward.
- Proximity: A short flight can offer a fundamentally different academic and social experience.
- Cross-border familiarity: Family connections, past travel, and shared cultural references all lower psychological distance.
Where do Canadian students study? Canadians cluster most heavily in the Northeast—New England, New York, Pennsylvania—where proximity and prestige overlap. Athletics pull many into the Midwest and South, especially in Division I hockey and swimming. Western Canadians gravitate toward the West Coast, drawn by climate and cultural alignment.
What makes this story more compelling is the competitive context. Canada’s international student population is exploding: Statistics Canada reports a 29.7% increase in international enrollment at colleges and a 7.1% increase at universities in 2022–23. At the same time, Canadian media—including outlets like Global News—have highlighted moments when Canadian students reconsider U.S. study due to immigration or political concerns. The Associated Press has reported similar caution among Canadian educators. And yet, despite these headwinds, the pipeline into the U.S. remains remarkably consistent.
Canada’s outbound stability is not an accident. It is the product of decades of mutual educational engagement. And it remains one of the most dependable sources of academically aligned, English-proficient applicants in the world.
III. Mexico: A Major Market Hiding in Plain Sight
Mexico’s presence in U.S. higher education is often underestimated, partly because institutional attention tends to focus elsewhere. But the SEVIS numbers reveal a different reality: Mexico is a top-ten F-1 market, sending 23,756 active students in 2023.
Open Doors—which counts higher education alone—shows a steady range of 13,000–17,000 Mexican college students over the past eight years. In 2021–22, 14,500 Mexican students were enrolled in U.S. higher education, an 11.6% year-over-year increase. This is a level of consistency that many global markets would envy.
The K–12 picture underscores the depth of the pipeline. Mexican students accounted for 3,732 U.S. K–12 enrollments in 2023, and the CBS reporting on daily cross-border commuters shows this isn’t simply a statistic—it’s a way of life for many families who live in Mexico but send their children to school in California, Arizona, New Mexico, or Texas. These pathways normalize the U.S. educational system long before college application season begins.
This matters because early schooling is one of the strongest predictors of college mobility. Students who attend American middle or high schools typically:
- Have family networks that reinforce cross-border continuity
- Understand U.S. academic expectations
- Participate in athletics or arts programs that transition naturally to college recruiting
- Build English proficiency and social comfort long before application season
Where do Mexican students study?
Mexican students follow recognizable regional patterns: nearly 49% enroll in the four U.S. border states. But strong clusters also appear in Florida, Illinois, and New York, especially in STEM, business, and aviation programs. Mexican enrollment is not random—it aligns with diaspora networks, family ties, and long-standing transnational routes.
The competitive picture matters here too. UNESCO reports 36,922 Mexican students studying abroad in 2022, spread across Canada, the U.S., Europe, and beyond. Reporting from the Dallas Morning News shows the sophistication of Mexico–U.S. academic partnerships—joint programs, cross-border initiatives, and degree pathways designed to position Mexican students for global labor markets.
Mexican families face real barriers—rising tuition, visa friction, limited Spanish-language outreach. But none of these diminish the pipeline’s underlying strength. If anything, they explain why the market is stable rather than explosive. When institutions lower these barriers, they often see immediate gains.
IV. Policy Shifts and Perceived Risk: Why Canada and Mexico’s Stability Should Not Be Taken for Granted
Even stable markets respond to instability—and the political climate in the United States is increasingly part of the enrollment calculus for Canadian and Mexican families. While cross-border mobility has deep cultural and economic roots, recent reporting highlights how the Trump administration’s renewed focus on visa restrictions, border security, and social-media screening has introduced new hesitation among students who once viewed American universities as a straightforward pathway.
Bloomberg recently reported that the administration is moving toward new foreign-student visa crackdowns, including intensified background checks and potential numerical limits—policies that would affect even historically “safe” markets like Canada and Mexico. That concern is already being echoed north of the border. Global News highlighted growing unease among Canadian students and parents who worry that the U.S. may no longer offer the predictability or ease of entry they once took for granted. These anxieties are not hypothetical: the Associated Press reported on a case where the U.S. government moved to block entry for foreign students admitted to Harvard, prompting fears that acceptance letters may not guarantee arrival.
The ripple effect has already reached institutional leadership. Politico reported that a major Canadian professors’ association advised faculty to avoid travel to the United States amid concerns about border unpredictability—raising questions about how academic mobility, research collaboration, and student advising flows may change. In parallel, the New York Post revealed that Harvard University and the University of Toronto have discussed contingency plans that would allow foreign students to continue their studies in Canada if U.S. entry were denied. These are extraordinary measures—signals that the U.S.’s closest educational partners are bracing for potential disruption.
Mexico is feeling these currents as well, though in a different way. PIE News has reported on a rise in Mexican and Latin American interest in Canada, particularly as families seek alternatives perceived as more predictable or welcoming. Chatham House notes that both Canada and Mexico are broadly reassessing their strategic posture toward the United States in the Trump era, with education and workforce pipelines explicitly part of the conversation. These national-level shifts filter down into family-level decisions: students who might once have defaulted to a U.S. degree now weigh Canada’s clarity and immigration stability against the uncertainty of the U.S. policy climate.
None of this means Canada or Mexico will suddenly stop sending students to the United States. The structural ties are too deep, and the educational incentives remain compelling. But it does mean that stability cannot be taken for granted. Even mature, proximity-driven pipelines respond to policy environments, media narratives, and perceived welcome. The institutions that thrive in this moment will be the ones that acknowledge these headwinds openly—communicating clearly about visas, timeliness, safety, and contingency pathways—and showing Canadian and Mexican families that the U.S. remains a place where their students can plan their futures with confidence.
V. The Quiet Central American Story
Central America sends 8,000–10,000 F-1 students to the U.S. annually, led by Panama, Guatemala, and El Salvador. Their motivations resemble Mexico’s: English proficiency, safety, and professional mobility. But access is uneven. As PIE News has reported, North American institutions face enrollment pressures, meaning that even historically stable flows shouldn’t be taken for granted. Central America remains a relationship-driven region where consistency matters far more than recruitment travel volume.
Please see our coverage of South & Central America here for additional insights.
VI. Why U.S. Colleges Underestimate Their Nearest Markets
Two assumptions shape how institutions treat proximity markets:
- “They’ll come anyway.”
But proximity does not guarantee yield. Stability erodes without meaningful engagement. - “These are background markets.”
Yet Canada and Mexico together send more students to the U.S. each year than many heavily targeted regions combined. They are not background markets—they are structurally important ones.
Ignoring these markets in an era of rising global competition is not just an oversight. It’s a strategic vulnerability.
VII. What U.S. Colleges Can Do Now
- Invest in bilingual communication, especially Spanish-language cost guidance.
- Show up consistently in regions where these pipelines are concentrated.
- Leverage athletic recruitment in Canada.
- Build deeper K–12 partnerships, especially in border communities.
- Be transparent about financial expectations.
- Clarify CPT/OPT pathways with accuracy, not marketing language.
- Commit to multi-year presence rather than transactional outreach.
VIII. Conclusion: Stable Markets Deserve Strategic Attention
Canada and Mexico have quietly provided the United States with some of its most consistent international student pipelines for more than a decade. These flows are not new and not fragile—they are deep, durable, and reinforced by cultural, economic, and educational systems shared across borders. If U.S. institutions want resilience in an unpredictable global landscape, the first step is simple: start paying attention to the stability that already exists.
Sometimes, the most dependable markets are the ones closest to home.
References
MSN. (2025). Avoid U.S. travel if possible, Canadian academics are being urged
Bloomberg News. (2025). What Trump’s foreign student crackdown means for U.S. universities.
CBS News. (2024). Thousands of students cross the U.S.–Mexico border every day to attend school.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-mexico-border-students-graduation-transborder-education
Chatham House. (2025). Rewriting North America: How are Canada and Mexico adapting to Trump?
CSIS. (2024). Educational Exchange as a Strategic Priority in U.S.–Mexico Relations.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/educational-exchange-strategic-priority-us-mexico-relations
Dallas Morning News. (2017). Mexico and U.S. join in educating students to compete with the world.
Global News. (2024). Amid U.S. political uncertainty, should Canadian students rethink studying in the United States?
https://globalnews.ca/news/10082028/canadian-students-study-in-us-election-2024/
ICEF Monitor. (2025). International student recruitment in Mexico: Demand for language study still leading the way.
Institute of International Education (IIE). (2022). Open Doors 2022: Fast Facts (includes 2020–21 & 2021–22 country totals).
https://opendoorsdata.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Open-Doors-2022_Fast-Facts.pdf
Institute of International Education (IIE). (2023). Open Doors 2023: Canada Fact Sheet.
https://opendoorsdata.org/fact-sheets/canada/
Institute of International Education (IIE). (2023). Open Doors 2023: Mexico Fact Sheet.
https://opendoorsdata.org/fact-sheets/mexico/
New York Post. (2025). Harvard, University of Toronto make contingency plan to allow foreign students to study if barred from US.
PIE News. (2023). Enrolments drop in North America as students look to Asia and Europe.
https://thepienews.com/news/enrolments-drop-in-north-america-as-students-look-to-asia-and-europe/
Politico. (2025). Canada professors association tells academics to stay away from U.S.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/15/canada-travel-us-advisory-00291598
Statistics Canada. (2024). International student enrolments in Canada, 2022–23.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/241120/dq241120b-eng.htm
Trade.gov. (2023). Mexico: Education and Training Services Industry Snapshot.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2022). Global Student Mobility Data — Mexico.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2022). SEVIS by the Numbers: Calendar Year 2021.
https://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/btn/22_0406_hsi_sevp-cy21-sevis-btn.pdf
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2023). SEVIS by the Numbers: Calendar Year 2022.
https://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/btn/22_0406_hsi_sevp-cy22-sevis-btn.pdf
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2024). SEVIS by the Numbers: Calendar Year 2023.
https://studyinthestates.dhs.gov/2024/05/read-the-2023-sevis-by-the-numbers-report
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2023). All Students by Country of Citizenship, CY 2023 (includes Canada & Mexico).
https://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/btn/24_0510_hsi_sevp-sevis-btn-2023-all-students-by-coc.pdf